And you can't prove the lies are facts so we have ourselves a predicament don't we?

ABC? A good source? LMAO

Here's a good source:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/members-of-frin.html

Completely false jackass, check your sources.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_palin.html

Well, Mr Plucink you may be partially right. After doing a little research the story goes like this. She was firmly behind the bridge bill up until two of the politicians who headed up the bill were investigated for corruption. She was still given the money for the bridge but was not restricted on what she could spend it on so she chose to spend it on other items that weren't as embarrassing as the bridge bill. If this is her biggest mistake then sign me up. Oh, I found a great site for fact checking. (Factcheck.org) You should check it out, you might learn a thing or two. lol

and, remind me... was she for or against the Bridge to Nowhere?? or was it both? I think it was both.

And now she's against ear marks and pork barrel projects? Well, change your stance to whatever suits you at the time I guess right?

The librarian was approached and asked if it was a possibility but no list was ever presented or created.

Perhaps a little bit of research would do you some good. The claims that Sarah attempted to ban books is false as is most of the other nonsense these liberal blogs are spreading throughout the web. Perhaps these two links will help shed some light on your misunderstanding.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/bannedbooks.asp
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/09/mccain-camp-responds-to-f_n_124947.html

I'M @@#!!!% PROUD OF YA HOW 'BOUT A COOKIE!

Let us use caps more shall we chaps?

She also tried to ban certain books from a library when she was mayor.

Sounds committed alright.

An eye for an eye makes the world blind.

i think bill shock him up a little.